|
ANA applauds introduction
of mandatory overtime legislation
On February 12, 2003, ANA hailed the Safe Nursing and Patient
Care Act of 2003, a bill introduced by Rep. Pete Stark (D-CA)
and Rep. Steven LaTourette (R-OH) that would strictly limit
the use of mandatory overtime for nurses. Sens. Edward Kennedy
(D-MA) and John Kerry (D-MA) introduced companion legislation
in the Senate.
The proposed legislation, which has more than 36 U.S. House
of Representatives and 10 U.S. Senate co-sponsors, would address
the current nurse staffing crisis in the U.S. by strictly limiting
the use of forced overtime among nurses, a dangerous practice
that has contributed to a recent exodus of nurses from the nations
hospitals and a decline in safe, quality patient care. ANA has
been at the forefront of the push for this legislation and worked
collabor-atively on its development with members of Congress
and organizations representing nurses.
We know that excessive use of mandatory overtime by health
care facilities has been on the rise, said ANA President
Barbara Blakeney, MS, APRN,BC, ANP. In fact, 67 percent
of respondents to an ANA health and safety survey reported working
some form of mandatory or unplanned overtime every month. This
proposed legislation would prohibit health care facilities from
forcing exhausted nurses to work extra shifts, an unsafe practice
that puts both patients and nurses at risk.
The Safe Nursing and Patient Care Act would:
Prohibit health care facilities that receive Medicare
funding from requiring a registered nurse (RN) or licensed practical
nurse (LPN) to work beyond an agreed to, predetermined, regularly
scheduled shift. In no instance could a nurse be required to
work more than 12 hours in a 24-hour period or for more than
80 hours in a two-week period - a provision that would prevent
an institution from altering shift schedules in a way that would
undermine the law.
Include nondiscrimination protections for nurses who
refuse overtime and for nurses who provide information and/or
cooperate with investigations about the use of overtime.
Include an exception in the case of a declared national,
state or local emergency. Such an emergency would be in response
to an unpredictable disaster, not in response to a staffing
deficiency resulting from management practices.
Provide for a study by the Department of Health and Human
Services on the maximum number of hours that may be worked by
a nurse without compromising patient safety.
The ANA has long warned that mandatory overtime is dangerous
for patients and nurses, and that the practice has been driving
nurses away from the profession, thus exacerbating an emerging
nursing shortage that is expected to worsen dramatically over
the next 10 years.
To counter staffing insufficiencies that are already occurring,
many health care facilities across the nation have increasingly
imposed mandatory overtime as a common practice. Typically,
an employer may insist that a nurse work an extra shift (or
more) or face dismissal for insubordination, as well as being
reported to the state board of nursing for patient abandonment,
a charge that could lead to a loss of license for the nurse.
At the same time, ethical nursing practice prohibits nurses
from engaging in behavior that they know could harm patients,
thus leading to a dilemma for many nurses.
By using health care law to address the problem, Congress is
recognizing that mandatory overtime is a health care crisis
that must be addressed if patients are to receive safe and effective
care.
|